Pulau Pinang Darul Banjir

Share ThisShare on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPrint this page
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Pulau Pinang Darul Banjir

  1. Anonymous says:

    Suffering of Penang people? Only when floods.

    Suffering of the whole of Malaysian people? All the time. GST. And endlessly rising prices.

    Najib doesn’t bother. His gomen, too. No reports or photos, no campaign by Ministry of Local Trade to curb, catch and fine the rogue traders.

    Fear losing votes of the traders? But he’ll lose votes of the suffering Malaysian public. Many grumbling now cannot get full tank of their motorbikes from the same budget they had before GST.

  2. Pingback: Pulau Pinang Darul Banjir – MediaLantang.Com

  3. Anonymous says:

    See how ridiculous this is? China is pouring in money to save a Malaysian company Proton and Najib is pouring in money in US to help uplift its economy.

    Developing country offers financial support to developed country? Dunia terbalik?

  4. Anonymous says:

    Najib should tell Texas and Florida people to blame Trump for the flood brought by tornados Harvey and Irma?

    Pakailah otak sikit.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Most if not all of the survey money we to DAPigs coffers — directly or indirectly

  6. Anonymous says:


    • Anonymous says:

      Despite being told in the past,

      the bloke comes out again with worm writing in a blog where the readers are used to BI or BM, possibly thinking his is a higher culture, not respecting the Constitution of the country Article 152 stating the National Language of the country is BM.

      He should read the following:

      The Myth of the Chinese Cultural Pre-eminence

      Ancient Chinese records aggrandized Chinese culture while at the same time denying the achievements of other cultures and races. Chinese historical documents had often been re-written, making it difficult to ascertain the truths.

      The burning of the books occurred not just over 2,000 years ago during Emperor Chin Shih Huang Di, but also in the 1960s during the so-called Cultural Revolution of Mao Zedong.

      Chinese history claimed China as the “Middle Kingdom”, others around them, and even far away, as “barbaric and uncivilized”.

      Those thinking theirs is a higher culture and others have a lower one must read what History Professor Wang Gung-Wu (formerly of Universiti Malaya, now in Singapore?) said in his essay “Early Ming Relations with S.E.Asia” pg. 36:

      “ … All peoples who believed that they alone were civilized did so because they thought their neighbours less civilized than themselves. This view was often proved wrong by subsequent contact with other civilized peoples.”

      Another academician, Albert Kolb, also pointed out in his book, “East Asia”, 1971,

      “For a long time, it (Chinese culture) was taken to be older, and possibly also richer in original features, than in fact it is”. (Pg 25).

      “Chinese culture cannot be thought of as originally Chinese because the Chinese themselves emerged gradually as a blend of many races and peoples”. (Pg 26).

      According to Professor Wolfram Eberhard, in his book “A History of China”, 1977, writings about ancient China were inventions of a later period, what were said to have been done by the Chinese rulers and the dates they were said to have been done appeared to be even later still. All these indicated that historical writings in China were meant to serve certain politico-ethical objectives.

      These are the words Professor Eberhard himself wrote:

      “Furthermore, we can now state with certainty that the historical data which were given in written documents for times down to 1,000 BC are false. They are the result of astronomical-astrological calculations, made by specialists of later times who pursued their own special political aims by doing these calculations”. (Pg 1).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.