US Attempting Regime Change in Malaysia: Fact or Fiction?


Despite claims of being non-partisan and unaffiliated with any political party, the country’s main opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim, fully endorsed the movement. (Photo by Nile Bowie)

Source: RT

As the South-East Asian nation of Malaysia prepares for general elections, distrust of the political opposition and accusations of foreign interference have been major talking points in the political frequencies emanating from Kuala Lumpur.

The United Malays National Organization (UMNO) leads the country’s ruling coalition, Barisan Nasional, and has maintained power since Malaysian independence in 1957.

One of Malaysia’s most recognizable figures is former Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, who has been credited with ushering in large-scale economic growth and overseeing the nation’s transition from an exporter of palm oil, tin, and other raw materials, into an industrialized economy that manufactures automobiles and electronic goods.

The opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, is headed by Anwar Ibrahim, who once held the post of Deputy Prime Minister in Mahathir’s administration, but was sacked over major disagreements on how to steer Malaysia’s economy during the 1997 Asian financial crisis.

Today, the political climate in Malaysia is highly polarized and a sense of unpredictability looms over the nation. Malaysia’s current leader, Prime Minister Najib Razak, has pursued a reform-minded agenda by repealing authoritarian legislation of the past and dramatically loosening controls on expression and political pluralism introduced under Mahathir’s tenure.

Najib has rolled back Malaysia’s Internal Security Act, which allowed for indefinite detention without trial, and has liberalized rules regarding the publication of books and newspapers. During Malaysia’s 2008 general elections, the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition experienced its worst result in decades, with the opposition Pakatan Rakyat coalition winning 82 parliamentary seats. For the first time, the ruling party was deprived of its two-thirds parliamentary majority, which is required to pass amendments to Malaysia’s Federal Constitution.

In the run-up to elections scheduled to take place before an April 2013 deadline, figures from all sides of the political spectrum are asking questions about the opposition’s links to foreign-funders in Washington.

The Question of Foreign-Funding

Malaysia’s former PM Dr. Mahathir Mohamad has long captured the ire of officials from Washington and Tel Aviv, and though he’s retired, he has channeled his energies into the Perdana Global Peace Foundation, which recently hosted an international conference in Kuala Lumpur calling for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 and has sought to investigate war crimes committed in Gaza, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Mahathir has been an ardent critic of Israel and organizations such as AIPAC, and has recently accused US-based organizations the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the Open Society Institute (OSI) of holding a concealed intention to influence Malaysia’s domestic politics through the funding of local NGOs and groups directly linked to Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Rakyat opposition coalition.

In an article the former prime minister published in the New Straits Times, a leading mainstream newspaper, Mahathir accuses financier George Soros and his organization, the Open Society Institute, of “promoting democracy” in Eastern Europe to pave the way for colonization by global finance capital.

Mahathir acknowledges how OSI pumped millions into opposition movements and independent media in Hungary, Ukraine and Georgia under the guise of strengthening civil society, only to have like-minded individuals nominated by Soros’s own foundation come to power in those countries.

The former prime minister has also pointed to how Egypt (prior to Mohamad Morsi taking power) has cracked down on NGOs affiliated with NED, namely groups such as the National Democratic Institute, the International Republican Institute (IRI) and Freedom House, which are all recipients of funding from the US State Department.

In Malaysia, high-profile NGOs and media outlets have admittedly received funding from OSI and satellite organizations of NED. Premesh Chandran, the CEO of the nation’s most prominent alternative media outlet, Malaysiakini, is a grantee of George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and launched the news organization with a $100,000 grant from the Bangkok-based Southeast Asian Press Alliance (SEAPA), another organization with dubious affiliations to the US State Department.

Malaysiakini has come under pressure from local journalists for the lack of transparency in its financial management and hesitance in revealing the value of its shares. Additionally, Suaram, an NGO promoting human rights, has borne heavy criticism over its funding and organizational structure. The Companies Commission of Malaysia launched investigations into Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd, a private company linked to Suaram, and found it to be a conduit for money being used to channel funds from NED.

Suaram has been instrumental in legitimizing allegations of a possible cover-up of the murder of a Mongolian fashion model, Altantuya Shaaribuu, who was living in Malaysia in 2006 and associated with government officials that have been linked to a kickback scandal involving the government’s purchase of submarines from France. Senator Ezam Mohd Nor, himself a recipient of Suaram’s Human Rights Award, has accused the organization of employing poor research methods and attempting to disparage the government:

Malaysians have the right to feel suspicious about them. They have been making personal allegations against the Prime Minister [Najib Razak] on the murder of Altantuya and many other cases without proof… their motive is very questionable especially when they are more inclined towards ridiculing and belittling the ruling government.

The German Embassy in KL has reportedly admitted that it has provided funds to Suaram’s project in 2010. Malaysia’s Foreign Minister Anifah Aman followed by making strong statements to the German Ambassador and declared that Germany’s actions could be viewed as interference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state.

Since 2007, Bersih, an association of NGOs calling itself the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections, staged three street protests in which thousands of yellow-clad demonstrators took to the streets in Kuala Lumpur demanding electoral reform. After coming under heavy scrutiny for obfuscating funding sources, Bersih coalition leader Ambiga Sreenevasan admitted that her organization receives funding from the National Democratic Institute and the Open Society Institute.

Sreenevasan herself has been the recipient of the US State Department’s Award for International Women of Courage, and was present in Washington DC in 2009 to receive the award directly from the hands of Michelle Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. While Sreenevasan’s organization claimed to be non-partisan and apolitical, members of Malaysia’s political opposition openly endorsed the movement, and some were even present at the demonstrations.

Anatomy of Malaysia’s Political Opposition

Malaysia is a multi-cultural and multi-religious state, and both the ruling and opposition parties attempt to represent the nation’s three largest ethnic groups. Approximately 60 per cent of Malaysians are either ethnic Malay or other indigenous groups and are mostly listed as Muslim, while another 25 per cent are ethnic Chinese who are predominantly Buddhist, with 7 per cent mostly Hindu Indian-Malaysians.

The United Malays National Organization, the Malaysian Chinese Association, and the Malaysian Indian Congress head Barisan Nasional. The opposition, Pakatan Rakyat, currently controls four state governments and is led by Anwar Ibrahim’s Keadilan Rakyat, the Chinese-led Democratic Action Party (DAP), and staunchly Islamist Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS).

While a large percentage of urbanites with legitimate grievances are quick to acknowledge the government’s shortcomings, many are hesitant to back Anwar Ibrahim due to his connections with neo-conservative thinkers in Washington and general disunity within the opposition.

Ibrahim maintains close ties with senior US officials and organizations such as the National Endowment for Democracy. In 2005, Ibrahim chaired the Washington-based Foundation for the Future, established and funded by the US Department of State at the behest of Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of then-Vice President Dick Cheney, thanks in large part to his cozy relationship with Paul Wolfowitz.

While Ibrahim was on trial for allegedly engaging in sodomy with a male aide (of which he was acquitted sometime later), Wolfowitz and former US Vice-President Al Gore authored a joint opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal in support of Ibrahim, while the Washington Post published an editorial calling for consequences that would affect Malaysia’s relations with Washington if Ibrahim was to be found guilty. Ibrahim enraged many when he stated that he would support policy to protect the security of Israel in an interview with the Wall Street Journal; this is particularly controversial in Malaysia, where support for Palestine is largely unanimous.

Malaysian political scientist Dr. Chandra Muzaffar writes:

It is obvious that by acknowledging the primacy of Israeli security, Anwar was sending a clear message to the deep state and to Tel Aviv and Washington that he is someone that they could trust. In contrast, the Najib government, in spite of its attempts to get closer to Washington, remains critical of Israeli aggression and intransigence. Najib has described the Israeli government as a ‘serial killer’ and a ‘gangster’”.

Members of Barisan Nasional have addressed Ibrahim’s connections to the National Endowment for Democracy in the Malaysian Parliament, including his participation in NED’s ‘Democracy Award’ event held in Washington DC in 2007. Independent journalists have uncovered letters written by Anwar Ibrahim, two of which were sent to NED President Carl Gershman in Washington DC that discussed sending an international election observer team to Malaysia and general issues related to electoral reform.

A third letter was sent to George Soros, expressing interest in collaborating with an accountability firm headed by Ibrahim. Pakatan Rakyat’s Communications Director, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, verified the authenticity of the documents. This should come as little surprise, as Ibrahim’s economic policies have historically aligned with institutions such as the IMF and World Bank, in contrast to Mahathir, whose protectionist economic policies opposed international financial institutions and allowed Malaysia to navigate and largely resurface from the 1997 Asian financial crisis unscathed.

An issue that concerns secular and non-Muslim Malaysian voters is the role of the Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) as part of the opposition. In sharp contrast to the moderate brand of Islam preached by UMNO, the organization’s primary objective is the founding of an Islamic state.

The PAS has spoken of working within the framework of Malaysia’s parliamentary democracy, but holds steadfast to implementing sharia law on a national scale, which would lead to confusing implications for Malaysia’s sizable non-Muslim population. The debate around the implementation of Islamic hudud penal code is something that other Pakatan Rakyat coalition members, such as figures in the Chinese-led Democratic Action Party, have been unable to agree on.

The PAS enjoys support from rural Malay Muslims in conservative states such as Kedah, Kelantan and Terengganu in northern Malaysia, though they have very limited appeal to urbanites. While certain individuals in PAS have raised questions about NGOs receiving foreign funding, Mahathir has insinuated that PAS’s leadership has been largely complicit:

They [foreign interests] want to topple the government through the demonstration and Nik Aziz [Spiritual leader of PAS] said it is permissible to bring down the government in this manner. They want to make Malaysia like Egypt, Tunisia, which were brought down through riots and now Syria…. when the government does not fall, they [Pakatan Rakyat] can appeal to the foreign power to help and bring down, even if it means using fire power.

Protestors form a human chain in the city center of Kuala Lumpur during April 2012 protests in support of the Bersih coalition (Photo by Nile Bowie)

Protestors form a human chain in the city center of Kuala Lumpur during April 2012 protests in support of the Bersih coalition (Photo by Nile Bowie)

Feasibility of ‘Regime Change’ Narrative

It must be acknowledged that the current administration led by Prime Minister Najib Razak has made great strides toward improving relations with Washington. At a meeting with President Barack Obama in 2010, Najib offered Malaysia’s assistance to cooperate with the United States to engage the Muslim world; Najib also expressed willingness to deploy Malaysian aid personnel to Afghanistan, and allegedly agreed on the need to maintain a unified front on Iran’s nuclear program.

Najib has employed a Washington-based public relations firm, APCO, to improve Malaysia’s image in the US and has seemingly embraced American economic leadership of the region through his support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement. Some would argue that Najib is perhaps the most pro-American leader Malaysia has ever had – a stark contrast to the boldness of Mahathir.

Despite Najib having good rapport with formal Western leaders, it is clear with whom the thank-tank policy architects, Zionist lobbies, and foundation fellows have placed their loyalties.

Sentiment among Malaysia’s youth and “pro-democracy” activists, who constitute a small but vocal minority, tend be entirely dismissive of the ‘regime change’ narrative, viewing it as pre-election diversionary rhetoric of the ruling party. While bogeymen of the Zionist variety are often invoked in Malaysian political discourse, it would be negligent to ignore the effects of Washington-sponsored ‘democracy promotion’ in the global context, which have in recent times cloaked mercenary elements and insurgents in the colors of freedom fighting, and successfully masked geopolitical restructuring and the ushering in of neo-liberal capitalism with the hip and fashionable vigor of ‘people power’ coups.

As the United States continues to militarily increase its presence in the Pacific region in line with its strategic policy-shift to East Asia, policy makers in Washington would like to see compliant heads of state who will act to further American interests in the ASEAN region.

Let’s not ignore the elephant in the room; the real purpose of America’s resurgence of interest in the ASEAN bloc is to fortify the region as a counterweight against Beijing.

The defense ministries of Malaysia and China held a landmark defense and security consultation in September 2012, in addition to frequent bilateral state visits and enhanced economic cooperation. It was the father of the current leader, Malaysia’s second Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak, who made the landmark visit to Beijing to normalize relations in 1974, and under his son Najib, Sino-Malaysian relations and cooperation have never been better.

Following the global economic crisis of 2008, Najib looked to Beijing to revive Malaysia’s export oriented economy, emphasizing increased Chinese investment into Malaysia and expanding the base of Sino-Malaysian trade in areas like education and student exchange, finance, infrastructure development, science and technology, yielding lucrative and mutually beneficial results. China has been Malaysia’s largest trade partner, with trade figures reaching US$90 billion in 2011; Malaysia is China’s largest trading partner among ASEAN nations.

In asking the question of regime change in Malaysia, Dr. Chandra Muzaffar reflects on Washington’s moves to bolster its military muscle and dominance over the Asia-Pacific region:

Establishing a military base in Darwin [Australia], resurrecting the US’ military alliance with the Philippines, coaxing Japan to play a more overt military role in the region, instigating Vietnam to confront China over the Spratly Islands, and encouraging India to counterbalance Chinese power, are all part and parcel of the larger US agenda of encircling and containing China. In pursuing this agenda, the US wants reliable allies – not just friends – in Asia. In this regard, Malaysia is important because of its position as a littoral state with sovereign rights over the Straits of Malacca, which is one of China’s most critical supply routes that transports much of the oil and other materials vital for its economic development. Will the containment of China lead to a situation where the hegemon, determined to perpetuate its dominant power, seek to exercise control over the Straits in order to curb China’s ascendancy? Would a trusted ally in Kuala Lumpur facilitate such control? The current Malaysian leadership does not fit the bill.

‘Backwards’ and Forwards

Pakatan Rakyat, the main opposition coalition pitted against the ruling party, has yet to offer a fully coherent organizational program, and if the coalition ever came to power, the disunity of its component parties and their inability to agree on fundamental policies would be enough to conjure angrier, disenchanted youth back on to the streets, in larger numbers perhaps.

What is ticklishly ironic about reading op-eds penned by the likes of Wolfowitz and Al Gore, and how they laud Malaysia as a progressive and moderate model Islamic state, is that they concurrently demonize its leadership and dismiss them authoritarian thugs.

Surely, the ruling coalition has its shortcomings; the politicization of race and religion, noted cases of corrupt officials squandering funds, etc. – but far too few, especially those of the middle-class who benefit most from energy subsidies, acknowledge the tremendous economic growth achieved under the current leadership and the success of their populist policies.

Najib’s administration would do well to place greater emphasis on addressing the concerns of Malaysia’s minorities who view affirmative action policies given to Malay ethnicities as disproportionate; income status, not ethnicity, should be a deciding factor in who receives assistance. The current administration appears set to widen populist policies that make necessities affordable through subsidies and continue to assist low-income earners with cash handouts.

Najib has acknowledged the need for broad reforms of Malaysia’s state-owned enterprises over concerns that crony capitalism may deter foreign investment; this should be rolled out concurrently with programs to foster more local entrepreneurship. To put it bluntly, the opposition lacks confidence from the business community and foreign investors; even the likes of JP Morgan have issued statements of concern over an opposition win.

It should be noted that if Islamists ever wielded greater influence in Malaysia under an opposition coalition, one could imagine a sizable exodus of non-Muslim minorities and a subsequent flight of foreign capital, putting the nation’s economy in a fragile and fractured state. And yet, the United States has poured millions into ‘democracy promotion’ efforts to strengthen the influence of NGOs that distort realities and cast doubt over the government’s ability to be a coherent actor.

Malaysia does not have the kind of instability that warrants overt external intervention; backing regime-change efforts may only go so far as supporting dissidents and groups affiliated with Anwar Ibrahim. No matter the result of the upcoming elections, Najib appears to have played ball enough for Washington to remain more or less neutral.

According to Bersih coalition leader Ambiga Sreenevasan, Malaysia’s electoral process is so restrictive that a mass movement like Bersih is required to purge the system of its backwardness. These are curious statements, considering that the opposition gained control of four out of 13 states in 2008, including Selangor, a key economic state with the highest GDP and most developed infrastructure.

In response, Najib has adhered to Bersih’s demands and has called for electoral reform, forming a parliamentary select committee comprising members from both Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional.

As elections loom, Bersih coalition leader Ambiga Sreenavasan is already dubbing them “the dirtiest elections ever seen” – unsurprising rhetoric from a woman being handed her talking points by the US embassy.

­Nile Bowie for RT

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to US Attempting Regime Change in Malaysia: Fact or Fiction?

  1. Anonymous says:

    The RT “About US” gives a Moscow address. The article (haven’t read fully yet) is probably aimed at showing the stupidity of the Americans re Hillary Clittoris, ooops sori … Hillary Clinton giving an award to the fellow clittoris, oops sori, Bersih debris Ambiga a medal or something.

    Talks about foreign funding of Malaysian so-called NGOs by US and other Neocons, Jews and Zionists, etc.

    True enough, the last para says it all – “As elections loom, Bersih coalition leader Ambiga .. already dubbing them “the dirtiest elections ever seen” … a woman being handed her talking points by the US embassy.”

    Well done, RT.

    • Anonymas says:

      If only the US is not afraid of China so much, they wouldn’t have given two shits on our country (which is halfway point between the East and West trade). Try reading the posts in blog, they have also shown that Malaysia is also wedged between China and USA in terms of military strategy.

      It’s like Cold War all over again

    • Anonymous says:

      Hillary Clinton = Hilarious Cling On.

  2. joe black says:

    The MCA Chief Declares that UMNO Bloggers are Notorious with their SCOOP AND SPIN BEHAVIOUR?

    It looks like he is Absolutely right. It will be the Demise of UMNO if these people are allowed to persist for the citizens will no longer consider UMNO to be a credible entity but only good at scoop and spin.

    • Pakatan Puak Pembohong says:

      with every posting you make here, you sound more and more like a broken record. for 50 cents per posting, you are indeed cheap.

    • Anonymas says:

      Scoop? Isn’t ‘scoop’ a normal journalism term for any exclusive news? Or are you referring to Ice Cream Scoops?

      Definition of Scoop:

      1. [Informal] An exclusive news story acquired by luck or initiative before a competitor.
      2. [Informal] Current information or details: What’s the scoop on the new neighbors?

    • Anonymous says:

      Lol, Suara Keadilan has got 500% more spin. I remember the exact date 16 Sept 2008, SK’s headline says “We have conquered Putrajaya”. But I looked around and noticed that nothing has changed.

      Cakap kencang. Just like every article in SK, all are aimed in boosting DSAI’s ego (self-masturbation) without caring if it’s true or not. A lot of SK’s allegations were proven wrong by internet detectives (and real detectives) anyway.

    • The Real Rakyat says:

      So joe black, you are earning rm0.50 per article.of per line ah?? Either way you are still cheaper to hire than a line in any paper!! Hahahahaha

    • Anonymous says:


      UMNO may be good at scoop and spin, but you scoop the dog poof, chuck it in your mouth and then spin. How about that?

  3. Anonymas says:

    Hahahaha~ If the US relies on Pakatan for it’s regime change plan, it’s going to fail spectacularly like a train wreck! Nobody in Pakatan has the credibility to head a regime which is loved by the rakyat nor is ‘actually functional’. Not Emperor, Tokong, Butt Man or even Ayatolla Hadi Awang.

    Just 4 years with their own states, they managed to fuck up everything. Kelantan, having 20+ years under PAS is even more fucked up. No clean water, no economic growth, mass emigration and high social ills.

    If the US is going to root for PR in regime change, they need to seriously reconsider.

    • Anonymous says:

      2 words: “Hamid Karzai”

      Butt Man is going to be THE Hamid Karzai in Malaysia’s regime change plan.

    • Pakatan Puak Pembohong says:

      the US is only interested in installing a client state to do its bidding. they don’t care a thing what this PR regime is going to do to Malaysia.
      the US is in competition with China to see who is going to dominate Asia. Malaysia is not their only target. all of Asia is their target.
      but too bad for the Americans, their economy is a paper tiger. it is sinking. so in order for them to maintain their dominance, regime change in Asian countries is their only route.
      all China has to do is sit and wait. when these new, American installed puppet regimes messed up big time, and their economies sink into the pits, as surely they will, they will turn to China for help. then China will flash her cards and say “you want our help ? okay here’s the deal. expel all American agents, cells in your countries. round up those that accept money from American entities like the National Endowment for Democracy, and if there are American troops stationed in your countries, tell them to go back to where they came from.
      The Butt Man and his motley crew can continue to collude with the Americans. but when it comes to the crunch, when they realized that the Americans won’t help them when they are in trouble, when they finally realized that they are just puppets and playthings for Americans, then it is kingdom come for them.
      we should not worry unduly. these PR pests. they won’t last long. their so called top leaders are already well into their 60s and 70s. one is already 80 plus. how long can they stay in power ?
      simply put, when BN wins the 13thGE, another 5 more years of BN rule, even The Butt Man is moving into his 70s. no hope for him anymore. his other henchmen like the ice cream vendor and the voyeur Rafizi, they have no credibility. his daughter Miss Flip Flopping overrated, well, no hope for the Parti Kelibat Ranjang. DAP and PAS has no connections to the Americans. with the demise of The Butt Man and PKR, DAP and PAS will also go kaput, unless DAP and PAS decides to take over The Butt Man and PKR’s role as the Americans’ agents in Malaysia, which I think is probable but highly unlikely. although The Butt Man has too many flaws, one thing he has and the leaders of DAP and PAS have not, is charisma.
      just look at DAP’s leaders, look at PAS’ leaders. when Americans deal with them, these Americans could well say “geez, these twerps, if only Anwar was, still here. these twerps, nincompoops.”
      we only have to be patience, focus on the 13thGE. we win and PR is finished. focus people ! focus !

      • Anonymous says:

        “when BN wins the 13th GE … Butt Man … no hope for him anymore”

        Actually, when BN wins, Butt Man will simply fizzle away – he has already said if lose, he’ll retire. Unless he has a forked tongue or lidah bercabang.

        We should exploit as much as possible the report that he frantically tried to get a top level PR discussion. Variously speculated by people, including wanting PAS to say ok to Christians using kalimah Allah, stop hair salon and non-Muslim khalwat summons permanently, resolve the PAS Kelantan state government bribe on Perak DAP Nga and Ngeh with thousands of acres land to allow Nizar become MB Sekejap in 2008. Most of all, to try and “discuss” the PR PM candidature.

        When PAS at Muktamar 2012 said they want Hadi to be PM, the Butt Man was reported saying “can discuss” but what the hell is there to discuss when all along Hadi etc had been saying the PM issue can be discussed after the elections – the latest stand is discuss after the PRU13 candidates are announced.

        But they might even go to war (my hopeful thinking) on the candidates, as DAP at their recent Congress said they want additional State and Parliamentary seats – sure at the expense of PKR and/or PAS.

        US, China and Russia can pivot or robot for all I care, my immediate concern is to ensure BN win big and PR is sorely trounced. To that extent, where relevant, the post article is welcome.

    • KiNA says:

      But that was the plan.. They dont want Malaysia to function.. They want us to crash and burn.

  4. ray says:

    Well, Najib needs to accomplish 2 things.

    Firstly “retire” the deadwood in UMNO.

    Secondly, reach out to the majority kampung folks and Orang Asli to disseminate the truth.

    The foreigners with their puppets anwar and ambiga can go fly kite.

  5. ray says:

    Ambiga Sreenavasan dub PRU13 “the dirtiest elections ever seen”.

    ambiga should champion women’s rights in India, her forefathers’ land where the women were treated like sex objects.

  6. Nenek LGE says:

    Tanpa campurtangan orang luar, DAP sudahpun mewujudkan pasukan samseng yang s mungkin akan jadi satu gerakan terrorist yang tidak menghiraukan undang-undang dan kedaulatan.
    Dalam versi Mandarin, journalist dibelasah penyangak DAP untuk menghalang pemberita mengambil gambar. Inilah DAP yang melalak-lalak pasal Press Freedom, tetapi mereka sendiri mungkir apa yang dilaungkannya.
    Baca :

  7. salhas says:

    Actually I love to see the Rear Admiral to be PM. He is in possession of a magic wand to take this country to greater heights. His wife can attest to that. She didn’t classify him as the gift of god for nothing!

    • Anonymas says:

      in before his former comrades turn against him in a heartbeat and attack him from all sides

    • Anonymous says:

      Hahaha, good to hear jokes from the Pakatan Rakyat flers early in the morning.

      The wife has been a miserable soul all their married life, my dear. Di tikam depan belakang, menikam orang orang lain depan belakang, menikam physically and metaphorically as well.

      Mana ada orang macam dia di Malaysia ni. Playing politics like Machiavelli the 15th century Italian, the end justifies the means, his end is so blunt that anybody kena tikam gets mad at him and most Malaysians are.

  8. m.gandhi says:

    Malaysia is the Mother of all choke points in strategic geo-political terms because she stands astride the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea being a littoral nation embracing the Peninsula and Sabah and Sarawak. It is not the tiny Straits of Singapore which is peanuts compared with Malaysia’s. Even the Imperial Japanese Army conquered the Peninsula first after which Singapore laid hapless. Hence, it is of paramount importance that the incumbent Malaysian Government should be on very good terms with the super-powers to gain their trust and confidence. Or else, sayonara folks to the unique life-style we now all enjoy !

    • Anonymous says:

      Yes, the Super power US. Singapore will become China’s Fifth Column in the event of Super Powers hostilities in this region. Bloody Lee Kuan Yew has made it 72% Chinese.

      That’s why Obama was looking for a pivot when visiting Burma, Thailand and Cambodia recently. We might even benefit if the pivot is there. We should avoid a situation where Gajah dan Harimau berperang, pelanduk mati di tengah tengah.

      • Anonymous says:

        Military analysts of good standing say it’ll take some time yet before China can become a Super Power. They may have nuclear weapons but not the delivery systems.

        They have just built one aircraft carrier. They’ll need very many to get to the Super Power stage.

        Russia, though no longer the former Soviet Russia, is still a Super Power. Adequate nuclear weapons and delivery systems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.